by: Riza Cuartero,
Gail Guiang ,
Lanz Olives,
Klein Sze
INTRODUCTION
Friend zone is an emerging term that describes
the phenomenon between people who are in the state of uncertainty regarding
their stand in the relationship (Adjei,
2012). Given that
relationships are an inevitable part of human nature and people often tend to
misinterpret “friendly behavior” in heterosexual friendships, this often
becomes a challenge to both the one who wants to take the relationship to the
next level and the one who doesn’t in terms of keeping the friendship (Bleske & Buss, 2000). In this paper, the researchers will aim to develop an academic
description of the friend zone phenomenon and will attempt to explain the
process people go through when they decide to put someone in the friend zone.
METHOD
This study used
a purposive sampling where participants were selected based on their
characteristics, provided that they had put someone in the friend zone. The researchers gathered 11 participants (10
female, 1 male). Five of them were interviewed and the other half were sent to
a Focused Group Discussion (FGD). Phenomenology (i.e. descriptions of the
experiences) and Grounded Theory (i.e. explanation of the nature and process of
friend zone based from the participants) were used to analyze data while triangulation (i.e. cross verification of statements from two
or more participants), disconfirming evidence (i.e. conflicting themes were all
acknowledged to prove the absence of absence of bias), and member checking
(i.e. participants were asked about the content of transcripts to ensure
credibility of the data) were used to ensure
validity.
RESULT
What is the friend zone phenomenon?
These are the themes that emerged from the
first research question, which aimed to discover what the “friend zone
phenomenon” is for the participants of the research.
Theme
|
Definition/description
|
Sample quote
|
Advanced
refusal of a romantic pursuit
|
Stopping
the person from further pursuit of achieving the next level of the current
relationship.
|
"Friend
zone, parang iadvance, sasabihin mo na siya na bawal na ganyan, ganyan kasi
friends lang talaga"
|
Misperception
of an individual’s romantic interest
|
Wrongly
perceiving target's interests in the person who is friend zoned
|
"kunwari
nagshoshow ng affection yung isa pero sa isa parang normal lang. ok, yung pag
treat ko sayo pareho lang sa ibang guy friends"
|
False
expectations regarding the potential of the relationship to grow
|
Believing
that something good can possibly happen even without concrete reasons of its
existence
|
"Siguro
pag masyado nag expect yung isa pero wala naman talaga"
|
Borderline
between platonic relationship and romantic relationship
|
A
situation where the possibility of taking the relationship to the next level
is ambiguous to no chance at all
|
"Ang
friend zone, parang ito yung mundo na kinakatakutan ng mga lalake"
|
Polite
refusal
|
Declining
the offer of courtship in a pleasant manner
|
"I
think isa sa mga factors ng friend zone, kunwari ayaw mo sa guy pero nice
guy. Parang it’s a nice way of putting (rejecting) him in…"
|
According to the reports of the participants,
the “friend zone phenomenon” is a form of refusal people use when they seem to
lack the desire of taking the friendship to the next level. It is a stage where
one attempts
to stop the romantic pursuit of their friend while maintaining the relationship
as it is.
What are the reasons behind the friend zone phenomenon?
These are the themes the researchers were able
to discover when they were addressing why individuals usually put people in the
“friend zone”.
Theme
|
Definition/description
|
Sample quote
|
Friends’
and family's perceptions regarding the pursuer
|
Putting into consideration the opinion of one's friends and
family
|
"Kasi
siguro influence ng friends kaya ako natuturn off"
|
Parents'
expectations
|
They want to achieve the standards of the parents
|
"Oo,
parents, parents na ano kailangan may stable job ka muna bago
magrelationship"
|
Presumption
of relationship outcome/progress
|
Sudden achievement of a sense of how one wants the
relationship to be.
|
"mararamdaman
mo yun eh, may mga tao na ano eh, yung you two are better of as friends
rather than something intimate"
|
Academic
Priorities
|
The focus is on the sustenance and/or improvement of grades
and overall academic performance
|
"Eh
kasi nga dapat graduate na tayo"
|
Career
Priorities
|
The focus is not to miss any chances into being employed first
|
Oo,
parents, parents. Na ano kailangan may stable job ka muna bago mag
relationship
|
Past
Romantic Experiences
|
Being familiar with romantic relationships and learning from
one's knowledge.
|
"Mas
gusto kong friends lang parang kasi pag naging kayo or ano, masisira lang
yung friendship niyo pag nag-away kayo. Yun yung realization ko ng
pagkakaroon ng boyfriend, mas okay ng maging friends"
|
Race /
Ethnicity
|
Preference of a specific culture/lineage
|
"Uhm,
studies tapos tradition ng family, kunyari yung Pilipino, wala sandali lang,
ayoko na sa kanya"
|
Inconsistent
expression of affection
|
The amount of care and attention is not received on a regular
basis
|
"Basta
nandon yung nagpaparamdam, eh kasi baka mamaya wala lang, kikilos lang siya
pag naggraduate na kami ganon, parang inaantay nalang yung oras, kasi mas
malaki yung possibility na mawala yung feelings kapag huminto siya"
|
Age
Preference
|
Having an ideal age when choosing a partner
|
"Nakakaturn
off din yun pag masyado matanda. Sad kasi pag matanda"
|
Physical
attractiveness
|
Importance
of appearance when choosing a partner
|
Kasi yun
naman yung basis talaga eh, pangalawa na lang yung ugali. Pangalawa na lang
yung ugali. Parang for me yung factor talaga yung mukha eh.
|
Over
familiarity
|
Being
too accustomed to the person to the point that it is already unimaginable for
your relationship to turn romantic
|
"you’re
too comfortable with him as in parang hindi mo na siya iniisip na ganun"
|
The researchers were able to discover that
there were a number of factors which people put into consideration when they
decide to put someone in the “friend zone”. This usually includes
attractiveness, traditions, and influences of other people. However, despite
these factors which are more external in nature, there are also people who rely
on personal experiences, priorities and self-reflection on the relationship.
What are the lived experiences?
The researchers were able to discover common
experiences people usually go through before, during and after individuals put
someone in the “friend zone”.
Theme
|
Definition/description
|
Sample quote
|
Intimate
confrontation
|
The use
of reason which can compensate the situation with the use of compliments and
prep talk
|
"Sinasabe
ko na marami pang okay dyan, ganyan"
|
Adopting
a humorous approach
|
The use
of humor in confronting the person to stop the romantic pursuit
|
"Lolokohin
mo minsan na hindi kita type, hindi mo rin naman ako type. Magkaibigan lang
tayo."
|
Maintenance
of platonic relationship
|
The
belief that one is more suited to adopt the "friend" only role in
his/her life than something else
|
"Kasi
friends lang talaga tingin ko sayo"
|
Platonic
Sibling Relationship
|
The
belief that one is more suited to adopt the "brother/sister" role
in his/her life than something else
|
"Tingin
ko sa kanya parang sister lang"
|
Former-platonic
friend relationship
|
Relationship
started as a platonic friendship
|
"Syempre
nangstart friends, tapos nung tumagal parang naging close tapos
nanligaw"
|
Friendly
Dates
|
Hanging
out together without labeling it as a date o tainting the night out with any
romantic associations
|
"Tapos
may time na parang kasi parang napag-usapan namin na tinatanong din daw siya
ng mga kapatid niya kung ano ba daw meron? Tapos ang sinasagot niya lang daw
friends. Oh di sige friends. So para sa akin parang friends pero siyempre
alam mo na yung mga efforts niya as in ganyan parang as in halos everyday
kami lumalabas ganyan."
|
Indirect
Confession
|
The one
who was friend zoned indirectly/ambiguously showed his feelings towards his
friend
|
"Ang
tanga ko kasi lahat ng friends ko, literally lahat ng friends ko kahit hindi
ko kaibigan"
|
Generalized
Treatment
|
How the
person relates and deals with other people is the same as with the one who
she/he friend zoned
|
"tapos
meron iba na kunwari sa is among friend sweet ka, tapos sweet ka pala sa
lahat, dun mo narerealize na ah, generalized lang yung feeling"
|
Consideration
of Romantic Potential
|
Thinking
about giving the person a chance to escalate the relationship to a romantic
one
|
First
year pa lang. So parang ako naisip ko na “wow, 1st year pa lang may gusto na
siya sa akin tapos 3rd year lang nag effort.” Naisip ko sa utak ko na pano
kaya kung naging kami.
|
Following
the natural course of events
|
When the
person is unsure of the meaning his/her friends' actions so he/she just
follows to see where it is headed
|
"Ang
tricky nga nila eh, like yung isa, sabi niya “Justine, anjan yung ex ko na
ka-thing.” Tapos sabi niya “cross tayo para Makita niyang meron akong bago”
ganon. Eh ako naman, as a friend, nakipag cross"
|
Friendship
rewards and privileges
|
The
benefits received from the friends only relationship such as gifts, time,
etc.
|
Meron
pang benefits, syempre gusto ka niya. Masama pero halimbawa, “uy libre mo
ako”
|
Based on the data gathered, individuals who put people in
the “friend zone” all go through a process wherein it all starts from being
friends, which eventually progresses to having the friend exhibit desires of
taking the relationship to the next level and having to devise ways on how to
decline the pursuit while maintaining the friendship. Along the process, some
benefits are derived but the goal of maintaining the relationship is constant
throughout reports of the participants.
What is the outcome?
These are the themes that emerged when the
researchers attempted to discover what usually happens to the friendship after
individuals put their friend in the “friend zone”.
Theme
|
Definition/description
|
Sample quote
|
Increased
time for activities
|
Period where the focus is academics and friends
|
"More time sa friends ayun. Tsaka focus the
studies"
|
Longevity
of friendship
|
Kept the relationship as it is will make the friendship better
|
"Mas masaya lang yung after effects (of friendzone)
kasi mas magiging friends kayo, mas nagiging close kayo"
|
Emotional
Maturity
|
Learning how to handle situations well
|
"Benefits
ko? Mas nag mature ako, mas alam ko na yung gagawin ko tapos mas marami akong
friends!"
|
Happiness
in the long run
|
Future benefit for both parties (one who is friend zoned and
the one who does the friend zone)
|
"Siguro
sa umpisa it's not gonna make you happy but in long run, it will (being
friend zoned)"
|
Guilt
feelings
|
Sensing that you have done something wrong to the person
|
"Pero
syempre nakakaawa din sa part nila"
|
Increased
self-esteem
|
The
heightened sense of importance / value
|
kasi
parang “hala nanreject ka, ikaw na, ang haba ng hair mo”
|
Less
guilt
|
Feeling
that one has done something wrong but negative feelings is compensated by
reasons which makes the action "acceptable"
|
"Less
guilty ka, kasi parang yun na yung nicest way para/kesa sabihing “Hanggang
friends lang tayo kasi ang pangit mo”
|
Tainted
Friendship
|
The
quality of friendship has changed in a negative way
|
"It
was never the same! (friendship). Wala, parang naging bitter na rin siguro
siya"
|
Relational
Limitations
|
The
friendship was kept but certain boundaries were made
|
"May
wall na eh"
|
Results have shown that people who put their friend in the
“friend zone” usually draw their attention more on the positive outcomes
compared to the negative ones. They claim that they manage to have more time
for productive activities, they were able to keep the friendship despite
changes in the relationship and that they were able to make the person feel
better compared to outright rejection.
CONCLUSION, DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION
In conclusion, the friend zone phenomenon is the attempt of the individual who does not want to
take the relationship to the next level; to stop the romantic pursuit of their
friend; and try to maintain the relationship as it is. This usually occurs
because of several factors that are both external and internal in nature. This results in both positive and negative outcomes,
wherein the positive effects seem to outweigh all the negative effects.
Female participants defined the friend zone phenomenon as an
“advance refusal of a romantic pursuit and a pleasant rejection”; also it poses
as a form of relationship maintenance - effort to keep a relationship according
to what both parties want out of it (Guerrero & Chaves, 2005). One of the
straightforward bases in looking for quality partners in a relationship is
looking at observable characteristics such as physical appearance, other
reasons consists of social pressures from parents and peers (La Greca &
Mackey, 2004; Connolly, Furman & Konarski 2000; Baumeister, Wotman, &
Stillwell, 1993). Although the relationship starts as platonic, due to
familiarity, the receiving end of the friend zone tries to implicitly
communicate their romantic feelings and intentions to the other person. At the
same time, the giving end tries to implicitly reject the friend with the use of
negative relationship maintenance (e.g. avoidance, downgrading of sexuality).
Though it created guilt feelings because of the person’s reluctance in
inflicting pain in the person, the giving end tries to justify their actions in
order to lessen that guilt (Baumeister, Wotman, & Stillwell, 1993). This
eventually results in positive and negative outcomes (e.g. increase in self-esteem,
tainted friendship, occurrence of boundaries, guilt feelings). This is to
maintain the friendly relationship as it is.
It is recommended that future researchers gather an equal
number of male and female participants so that biased data will not be
gathered. Data will also be better authenticated and validated if a process
that aims to minimize the effects of social desirability bias is implemented.
With this, participants shall not have the means to fabricate their data to
suit their desires. Lastly, the researchers recommend that “friend zone”
phenomenon be studied from the receivers end.
REFERENCES
Adjei,
A. (May 29, 2012) The ‘new’ friend zone. ACIRFA Magazine. Retrieved
from: http://acirfamag.com/?p=2797.
Baumeister,
R.F., Wotman, S.R., & Stillwell, A.M. (1993). Unrequited love: On
heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness and humiliation. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (3), 377-394.
Bleske,
A. & Buss, D. (2000). Can men and women be just friends? Personal
Relationship, 7, 131-151.
Connolly,
Furman, & Konarski (2000). The role of peers in the emergence of
heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescents. Child Development, 71 (5),
pp. 1395-1408.
Guerrero,
L. & Chavez, A. (2005). Relational maintenance in cross-sex friendships
characterized by different types of romantic intent: An exploratory study. Western
Journal of Communication, 69 (4), pp. 339-358.
La
Greca, A.M., & Mackey, E.R. (2004). Adolescents’ anxiety in dating
situations: The role of other-sex friends, close friends, and romantic
partners. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 1-28.
Nicholson,
J. (2011, December 16). Escape the friend zone: From friend to girlfriend or boyfriend. Retrieved from
http://www.psychologytoday./blog/the-attraction-doctor.
Good day! This Russell Santos, a student taking up Bachelor of Arts in Psychology. I would like to raise a few points and questions with regard to your research.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I believe that your topic is quite interesting, especially that it is often discussed nowadays. Having said this, which age group do you think is affected by this phenomenon the most and why do you think so? Are there other factors not mentioned in your research that you think have effects as to why a specific age group is affected by this phenomenon?
Second, what other practical importance can this research contribute besides the explanation of the process itself?
Lastly, I do agree with your recommendation, wherein the receivers or the ones being "friend zoned" should be part of future studies. In relation to this, can you give some possible psychological research approaches that can be used in these future studies?
Thank you!
Hi Russell Santos, thank you for the comments. We believe that the age group most affected by this phenomenon is the emerging adulthood (18-26) because it is more of the exploratory age where one experiments on his/her life. Also, this is the age where people engage in romantic relationships so having a boyfriend/girlfriend is quite the norm.
DeleteAside from providing an explanation of the process itself, it actually provides a glimpse of how people usually think. It makes readers understand others better and promotes open-mindedness. In addition, it also gives an idea of what people usually consider when they choose someone to be their romantic partner. Lastly, it might even help people prevent the “friend zone phenomenon”.
Just like this study, future studies may also use grounded theory and phenomenology since the research would almost be the same except for the participants. Basically, the future study would look like this but the participants would be the people who got friendzoned.
Hello this is Marianne Madera taking us AB major in psychology- BS major in financial institution. I really like your qualitative study, very interesting study worthy to be a thesis topic. Good job! May I know what are the scope and delimitation of this study? Thank You!
ReplyDeleteHi Marianne! Thank you for giving the time to read our blog, we’re glad you found it thesis worthy. Anyhow, the scope of our study are the experiences of giving end of the friend zone. Our study is narrowed to the description and explanation of the phenomenon from the perspective of the individuals who put people in the friend zone. (i.e. its definition, what causes it, how it occurs and its outcomes). In addition to that, the results may only reflect the female population of the private university of the present academic year, 2012-2013 which the researchers focused on. Thank you! We hope we answered your question.
DeleteHi! I am Jan Claudine Cabigunda, taking up AB Developmental Studies and BS Legal Management. The research is very comprehensive and you were able to present the different sides of being "friend zoned, however, did you consider in your research the fact that many "friend zone" instances were caused by misunderstandings between the two people? Na-misinterpret nung guy ung pagpapakipot nung girl sa friend zone. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteHello Jan! Thank you for the praises! Yes, we did consider its possibility. According to the study, the receiving end of the friend zone tend to misinterpret their friend’s treatment in them, causing him/her to misunderstand their friendship relationship. One of our participants actually mentioned a similar situation wherein her “pagpapakipot” was misunderstood to be a friend zone move. Unfortunately, we weren’t able look into it as much as we could because our study was only able to focus on the experiences of people who purposely put people in the friend zone. However, further information on that kind of situation may be of great benefit for future studies on the phenomenon.
DeleteHi, this is Abbey Apacible, a student taking up BS Computer Engineering. First, I would like to commend the group for undertaking a well-defined and comprehensive qualitative study on an interesting topic especially for the youth nowadays.
ReplyDeleteAside from the fact that it gives readers knowledge on the 'friend zone' phenomenon, in what other ways could it play as an important factor?
Thank you :)
Hi Abbey! Thank you for sparing your time to read our blog post, and also for your kind words.
DeleteAside from the fact that it gives the readers knowledge on the phenomenon, it also provides a glimpse of how people usually think when considering someone as a potential partner. This includes the characteristics they usually look into, the reasons why some prefer to stay out of a relationship and the benefits people usually derive from putting someone in the ‘friend zone’ vs. outright rejection.
In addition it also paves the way for some people, specifically those who have been brought through the phenomenon, to understand what happened to them better. It can actually make people more open minded and understanding of this prevalent phenomenon.
Hi, this is Xiannen Dy, taking up AB International Studies Major in Japanese Studies. This is a very nice study since "friend-zone" is common nowadays.
ReplyDeleteOf course, at a certain point, you will have to tell the person who likes you that you only see him/her as a friend, when is the right time to let him/her know that or what are the signs to look for so that you will know he is ready to accept that? As his/her friend, you don't want to hurt him so much.
Another is for example, you're generally kind and sometimes sweet to your friends so how do you act or behave around your friend, who has a crush on you so that he/she won't think that you like him more than friends?
And, how do you avoid feeling awkward towards your friend once you told him that there isn't really anything more that you can offer except friendship?
Thanks :D
Hi Xiannen! Thank you for sparing some time to read our blog post.
DeleteIn our study, one general method used is infusing humor or complements in the confrontation process, also to be able to justify one’s act of “friendzoning” the other, the period or duration before one confronts the person is taken into consideration. However, since the focus of our study is only on the giving end of the friend zone, the study does not include information on the processes experienced by the receiving end of the friend zone.
Treating one friend like the other are also perceived as causes for the misinterpretation of the current friendship relationship. According to the study, the giving end of friend zone uses different techniques in trying to maintain one’s friendship, some are downgrading one’s sexuality, avoidance and withdrawal from any activity together with the other person, and having talks about one’s romantic relationship or pursuit.
Consequently, the study provided that there is no assurance that after the “friend zoned” act, the friendship will stay as close as before, and that some lead to a friendship with proposed boundaries.
Thank you! We hope your questions were answered.
Hello! I am Angelyn Condez, taking up BS Accountancy.
ReplyDeleteWhat are the main weaknesses with what you did and why are they there? What are the strongest/weakest parts of your research?
Hi Angelyn! The weakness of this research was it never looked into the perspective of the one being friend zoned, all of the subjects were those who friendzoned someone. Also, the study was biased to only female participants. The strength, on the other hand, is the fact that it gave a clear perspective of what, why and how people friend zone somebody. We hope your question was answered!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletewill "friendzone" apply to a community or society with a known culture of being friendly, for example european countries?
ReplyDelete-Robee Ilagan, Law student
Hi Robee! We believe that the only way to answer your question is to research friend zone on that context. Since our study only involved college students in the philippines, we can only answer our scope of research, and since Philippine culture is very different from European culture. Thank you.
DeletePutting your study into context, how does this relate to the levels of pakikipagkapwa? Plus, what do you think is the equivalent Filipino construct? - LR Astudillo
ReplyDeleteHi Ms. Liz!
DeleteGiven that people involved in the phenomenon all started out as friends, it can be assumed that they were able to go through the different “levels of interrelatedness” or levels of pakikipagkapwa, as coined by Virgilio Enriquez in his previous work. Initial levels of interrelatedness (for the outsider category) which include: pakikitungo (when they were just in a civil relationship), pakikisalamuha (where the interaction takes place), pakikilahok (a more deeper interaction where participation is more present), pakikibagay (doing something in accord with what the other is doing/wants) and pakikisama (where the period of adjustment in the relationship takes place). It can be assumed that as time went by, they went deeper in the relationship and went through the level of pakikipagpalagayang-loob (where rapport, understanding and trust is achieved) and was able to penetrate the “one of us” relationship. Based on the data we gathered from the interviews and FGDs, no one seemed to achieve the pakikisangkot and pakikiisa level because when the romantic feelings/pursuit from the friend came in after the pakikipagpalagayang-loob level, they either decided to limit their interactions or withdraw.
We think that the equivalent Filipino construct of friend zone is “kaibigang pagtingin” since the the rejector sees the rejectee as a friend and not a potential lover. However, it can also be a combination of the Filipino accommodative values of hiya, utang na loob and pakikisama. Given that hiya is a sense of shame, utang na loob is a sense of obligation to return a favor and pakikisama is the level of adjustment. All of these in combination somehow encapsulate the friend zone phenomenon from the perspective of our study since its seems to occur because of one’s hiya towards a friend who might have already done good things for him/her, which brings the sense of utang na loob, and eventually leads to going back to the more “outsider“ category of pakikisama/period of adjustment.
(based on Virgilio Enriquez’ work entitled: Developing a Filipino Psychology)
1. This is relevant topic in adolescent psych. Will you develop this into a thesis? If yes, what will be your next focus?
ReplyDelete2. Why do you have to use both interview and FGD to answer the same research question?
3. What is the rationale for combining phenomenological approach and grounded theory?
4. I think your themes are too many. Some can be combined. What themes are related that can be combined?
5. Is there a difference on how males and females define "friend zone?"
Ron Resurreccion
Hi Sir Ron! Thank you for sparing some time to read our blog post. Here are the answers to your questions:
Delete1. We might develop this into a thesis. Our next focus would be the one who got friend zoned since it is one of our limitations and this time, the number of male and female participants will be equal.
2. It gives us reliable answers, in terms of its elimination of the effect of the social desirability bias. Thee results acquired from the focus group discussion was also used to back up the interview results.
3. Given that friend zone is a new and popular phenomenon, it still has no established definition. So what the researchers thought of doing is to attempt to define the existing phenomenon from the Philippine context. We used the Phenomenological approach in order to define and describe the lived experiences of the respondents. However, to be able to satisfy the collection of data and explain the initial findings of the Phenomenological approach, Grounded theory was conducted. Furthermore, some of our research question answers the “what” while some answers “how and why” that is why phenomenology and grounded theory were used.
4. Yes, there are some themes that seemed to be overlapping, however there are clear distinctions as to why they are in different themes.
The overlapping themes would be:
Advanced refusal of a romantic pursuit & Polite refusal
Misperception of an individual’s romantic interest & False expectations regarding the potential of the relationship to grow
Tainted Friendship & Relational Limitations
5. One of the limitations of the study is that it is biased on female experiences and opinions for the reason that we were only able to get one male participant. However, if we were to base on the data we were able to gather, no. The male and females of our study did not define it differently.