This study was conducted by: Kim Arqueza, Raz Tan, Mae Teotico & Kaye Tirones
INTRODUCTION:
Our research is about
determining the views of adolescent homosexual gay men regarding Gaydar. Gaydar
is the ability to accurately predict a person's sexual orientation (K, Moore,
n.d.). According to previous studies by
Ambady, et al., women’s sexual orientation is easier to identify and judge
which is contradictory to our findings. Our study is important because it helps
us understand homosexuals more. Through our better understanding we get to know
how our approach towards them should be and how we should interact with them.
Through our study we get to understand why they are like that and therefore not
make conclusions about homosexual men.
METHOD:
Our participants for our
research are adolescent homosexual men, ages 16 to 20, who are studying in
private universities. We used phenomenology as our method to gather the essence
and the experience of our participants and further analyzed our data through
thematic analysis. To validate the data we have gathered, we conducted a
Focus Group Discussion among our 6 adolescent participants. Thus, we utilized
data triangulation in validating our individual interviews and that is by
conducting a Focus Group Discussion.
RESULTS:
How do homosexual men develop their Gaydar?
The themes present in this table describe how homosexual men develop their Gaydar.
The themes present in this table describe how homosexual men develop their Gaydar.
THEMES
|
DEFINITION
|
EXPEMPLAR QUOTE
|
Adolescence Stage
|
Developmental stage in human life
|
High school . yun talaga, yun yung pag usbong ng lahat ng bagay. Diba? Diyan yung kung saan yung curiosity nagsisimula. (IC3)
|
Acceptance of own gender
|
Acknowledgement of own sexual orientation
|
Na develop ko lang. kasi dati im very ano eh, uhm, I started from being straight and then I realized that im gay so its developing. (IC2)
|
Curiosity
|
Desiring knowledge about gays
|
Uhhm, again like nasabi ko na to lahat may gaydar nadedevelop nalang siya kasi natural nalang yan kasi for me bottomline ng gaydar for me is curiosity(IC5)
|
Social Pressure
|
Force exerted by the community on a person
|
Parang yung sa friend ko din, mahilig sila mangulit “huy, ano bakla ba to?” kaya parang na pressure ako na matuto na pano malaman(IC3)
|
Experience with gays
|
Interaction and socialization with homosexual men
|
May mga tao lang mas malalim lang gaydar nila due to experience. Kasi ako eversince highschool, may interaction na ako sa mga bading. (IC4)
|
Practice
|
Habitual performance of Gaydar
|
Kailangan mo siya ipractice para madelop. (IC3)
|
The
themes and definitions present in the table were derived from the responses of
our participants. The themes are also the most prominent answers that we got
from our participants. They develop their Gaydar in the adolescence stage by
acceptance of their own gender, through curiosity, social pressure, experience
with gays and by practice.
What behavioral cues are used to determine
the sexual orientation of others?
These
are the themes, its definition, and its quotes from our interviewed
participants on the behavioral cues that our participants look for to use their
Gaydar.
THEMES
|
DEFINITION
|
EXAMPLAR QUOTES
|
Gay conduct
|
Behavioral guide of gay people
|
mas dominating talaga yun
feminine side pero mas… though yun ibang lalaki mas dominating yun femininity
kaysa sa masculinity diba… pero mas define kapag gay men (IC3)
|
Smiling as a
welcoming gesture
|
Approachable
|
Yung gay parang una..mataray
muna. Pero pag lumapit ka ngngiti na yan. Tapos bigla nalang kayo
magkakahiyaan. Pero kapag guy talaga ..uhmm hirap nilang iplease. Ang isang
lang, pag lumapit sakanila, grabe makatingin parang lalamunin ka. (IC3)
|
Pitch of voice
|
Level of an individual’s tone of
voice
|
the way they talk, if its very
soft, quite soft “hey how are you doing” very sex and the city thing, (IC2)
|
Gay language
|
The unusual words or term while
in a conversation
|
Kasi yung iba nakakatawa eh.
Yung iba, buff na nga pero kapag sobrang lalaki ganyan pero kung magsalita
“ano fang basa te bang”. Ganun sila magsalita! Kakaloka.(IC3)
|
Refusal belief of being gay
|
Gay resistance of action of being gay; in denial
actions of being gay
|
Pag in denial ang person… mas masarap kasi
i-identify pag in denial ang person (FGD)
|
flirting
|
making moves on people they’re interested in
|
Tapos nagtext siya na pag nalasing ka, I’ll take
care of you, tapos sabi ko sa girl na kasama ko tinext ka niya? Tapos sabi
niya hindi, bakit tinext ka niya? Tapos sabi ko oo sabi niya sabi na, __ eh. (FGD)
|
Gay gossiping
|
Gay people talking about other gay people
|
we know gay guys they’re somehow talkative at times.
And some gay guys, they love watching other gay guys.(IC2)
|
Animated body
movements
|
Lively
gestures
|
yung iba nag
popout eh *pouts* *laughs* kasi yung iba todo picture, yung super vain. (IC3)
like mga
pilantik ng daliri niya. Pag nginiti niya. Galaw ng paa niya. Kahit mga
ganon. Pag naglalakad sila kumekembot sila. (IC5)
|
Close contact
|
Touchy;
nearness when interacting; proximity
|
If you say hi
*touches back* ganun, hugging the person, if you make beso.(IC1)
|
Intimate stares
|
Looking closely and slowly at
the person to judge
|
If I would
talk to him, I’ll see where his eyes would go and yun yun pinaka signs na
nakikita ko, kung saan nagscscan yun eyes niya. (scan in the private part)
(FGD)
kapag
tinignan ka na niya ng matagal, parang he’s checking you out, pero kapag ang
straight guy, titignan ka lang niya ng saglit, baka kilala ka nito, tapos o,
alis ka na… pero kapag gay guy yun titignan ka muna niya kung may itsura.
(IC5)
|
These themes show the most
common behavioral cues that our participants are looking to judge other
people’s sexual orientation. However, out of all these themes, intimate stare
of a person is one important behavior and the most prominent behavior that our
participants are looking for.
What physical attributes
are used to determine the sexual orientation of others?
THEME
|
DEFINITION
|
EXEMPLAR QUOTE
|
Self Presentation
|
how an individual decides to physically
present him/herself to the public.
|
“ they would really care how they look
like” (ICPC1)
|
Neat look
|
the charactersic of being clean/ to be
perceived as clean
|
“they always make sure na everything’s
neat, everything has to be in proper, ganun.” (ICPC1)
|
Posture
|
How an individual projects himself through
their body positions
|
“posture of the body is very important,
makikita mo talaga kung gay siya.
“ (ICPC2)
|
Fashion Sense
|
How an individual presents himself/herself
through the clothing they choose to wear
|
kasi ako usually titignan mo kung… ako yun
how he dress talaga eh, titignan mo,
ayun I always look at him na i don’t know kasi it’s important eh… it’s very
very important… di ko alam (ICPC5)
|
The
table for Physical cues presents the most prevalent themes we found in the
research and study we conducted. These themes and its definitions were also
gathered from the interviews and the FGD we conducted.
What social
attributes affect their judgment?
The themes present in this table
describe how social attributes affect homosexual men’s judgment of other
people’s sexual orientation.
THEMES
|
DEFINITION
|
EXEMPLAR
QUOTE
|
Social Background of subject
|
Environment of the target
|
So yung mga sinasabi ko sayo
ngayon is like saying lang kung anong nakikita ko. Through my eyes, through
whatever is happening in the environment.
|
“Pakikisama” with other
people
|
How they deal with other
people
|
Ng thorough na pakikisama
sakanya. Kasi malay mo feminine lang pala siya pero lalaki pala talaga siya.
(IC3)
|
Homogenous group
|
A unit composed of members
exhibiting similar characteristics
|
diba may sinasabi nga sila
na ano yun anong tawag dito yung tell me who your friends are and ill tel you
who you are ganun(IC2)
like…birds of the same
feather flock together(IC5)
|
Personal profile in social
networking sites
|
Information available in
online websites: status, pictures, mutual friends
|
what they type as their
status messages… and then on Twitter, like normal guys won’t say these
things, like for example, parang oh my God I like, oh my God Jane Fonda’s so
funny… kasi Jane Fonda’s an icon (IC1)
|
Participation in the arts
|
involvement in ballet and
theater
|
the mere fact that he was
doing ballet, for me, kasi diba guys don’t usually do ballet (IC1)
|
Family members
|
Those who are part of the
immediate family
|
Napakalaking percentage sa
studies na hereditary ang pagiging gay (FGD)
|
Occupation
|
Work preference
|
for me gay jobs..like my
job, Im sorry. Design, arts like fine arts, like interior desing, fashion
design uhm, what else yeah about painting, about clothes about uhm, furniture
like that oo yun. (IC2)
|
Exposure to femininity
|
Susceptible to female
characteristics
|
tapos ano rin.. yung.. kung
san siya lumaki. Kunwari sa family siya lang yung lalaki.. Tapos yung mga
kapatid niya puro mga babae. May possibility na maenhance niya yung pagiging
gay niya. Pero meron din naman mga iba na matigas pa rin. Yung ganun.. (IC3)
|
Influence of peers
|
Impact of friends
|
I think through my friends
who also tells me na he’s gay ganun ganun, why, like I ask them like how do
you know why ganon ganon, and when I tell na this person’s gay they also ask
me why ganon, (IC1)
|
Gay stereotypes
|
Patterns of what is expected
to be manifested in Gay
|
For me parang, first you
have to rely on stereotypes (FGD)
|
Technological advancements
|
Applications that help
distinguish one’s gender
|
Or you could use ‘Grindr’
it’s an application for sex or friendship whatever. You find gay guys in the
area using that app
|
The
themes and definitions present in the table were derived from the responses of
our participants. The themes are also the most prominent answers that we got
from our participants. Social attributes like social background of the person,
“pakikisama” with other people, homogenous group, profile in social networking
sites, participation in the arts, family members, occupation, exposure to
femininity, influence of peers, gay stereotypes and technological advancements
affect their judgment.
In what context
does one use their Gaydar?
These are the themes, its
definition, and exemplar quote from our participants to where they usually use
their Gaydar.
THEMES
|
DEFINITION
|
EXAMPLAR QUOTE
|
Triggering Venues
|
context that people
use their gaydar
|
Oh of course,
everywhere its on. Sa parking lot, kahit saan. Kahit saan ka magpunta. (IC5)
|
Non-specific
|
No specific place or
situation used to judge gays
|
Uh, actually there’s
no specific place. If you see a guy right away, that’s the time that it turns
on.(IC1)
|
School
|
Defined
as a situation of having a less tendency to judge people by the participants;
place where students go to learn
|
kasi
pag sa school asaran ganyan *laughs* maghanap ka nga ng gay dito, parang
ganun. Medyo hindi siya ano eh, ano siya, hindi siya yung parang gusto mo
gamitin yung gaydar. (IC3)
|
Mall
|
Defined
as a situation of having a less tendency to judge people by the participants;
place where people go for variety purposes
|
Sa
ano, sa mall mahirap din maghanap..Parang ano lang. medyo pnprioritize ko
muna kung ano yung gusto ko. Kapag sinasabihan ko ng friends ko *murmurs*
wala, seryoso ako maghanap ng damit, make up mga ganun. Mga gusto ko muna.
(IC3)
|
Clubs
|
Defined
as a situation of having more tendency to judge people by the perticipants;
place to where people dance and drink
|
uhm
kasi in clubs diba you’re all there to
have fun so it’s easier to tell kasi you’re more wild ,more happy so it’s easier as in
sa school people are more concentrated serious so I guess in school its
harder but in public place especially
when youre having fun that’s when it comes out(IC1)
|
bars
|
Defined
as the welcoming atmosphere by the respondents; place where people drink to
socialize
|
Sa
bar, pag nagiinuman kayo, mas maganda mauuna yung eye to eye. Tapos susunod
na yung.. huli na yung pakikipagusap (IC3)
|
To conclude, our participants
use their Gaydar in situations like clubs and bars because their main agenda is
to find people they are interested in rather than in schools and malls where
they have other priorities rather than finding people they are interested to.
Their agenda in judging depends on the situation they are in to.
How do homosexual men determine other people’s sexual
orientation?
Table
of the constructed themes on how homosexual adolescent males identify other
people’s sexual orientation
Themes
|
Definition
|
Exemplar
Quote
|
Biased usage
of gaydar on the subject sex
|
The
discrimination on the usage of Gaydar in targets where one is preferred over
another.
|
“Una sa lahat
wala akong pake kung homosexual siya or hindi, wala naman ako makukuha dun
eh. Gets mo? So bakit ko aalamin eh wala naman akong pake.”
|
Rarely used
|
Gaydar is
used very seldom
|
“oo. Pwede .
pero not totally, again cause hirap ako sa girls.”
|
Not used at all
|
Gaydar is never used in any situation.
|
“Never talaga siya nag on sa girls”
|
Unintentional judgment
|
judging of
sexual orientation is done without purpose and intention.
|
“parang
napapatingin ako… yun mapapastare ako na hindi ko.. hindi ko ginusto.”
|
Intentional judgment
|
Judging of sexual orientation is done with intention
and purpose.
|
“Most of the time intentional.. misnan titingnan mo
lang yung gwapong guys ”
|
Triggering attributes for judgment
|
Characteristics of a person that triggers the use of
gaydar
|
“yung
parang may fishy..may something fishy sakanya”
|
Motives
|
the reason or purpose of the judgment.
|
“there’s this thing inside the person that you wanna
know bading ba to tingnan mo galawa niya pero di namn. So parang yung have to
satisy your curiousity and you have to do these things”
|
Sensual
|
the use of senses such as the ability of seeing,
hearing, feeling and smelling in identifying other people’s sexual orientation
|
“So yung mga sinasabi ko sayo ngayon is like saying
lang kung anong nakikita ko. Through my eyes, through whatever is happening
sa environment.”
|
Snap judgment
|
hurried decision or finding of other people’s sexual
orientation
|
“Minsan
snap siya, pero chinachallenge ko yung snap na yun kasi di ako nagtitiwala ng
agad agad.”
|
Empirical
|
systematic way of judging through observation and
experience
|
“minsan
it takes time eh”
|
Validation
|
Confirmation of the derived judgment through certain
ways.
|
“bukod
sa pakikipag-usap…
naghahanap
din ako ng source sa internet parang ganyan… pang back-up na ganito talaga
siya”
|
Ethical consideration
|
What to do with judgment
|
“kadalasan,
I keep it to myself. Kasi may mga tao.”
|
The
themes formed shows that there are different ways and personal biases on how
homosexual adolescent males identify other people’s sexual orientation. For
example, their judgment can be either a snap judgment or empirical.
CONCLUSION,
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Gender
discrimination on judgment towards target sex is abundant in the process of
Gaydar among homosexual adolescent males. Our data from the interview shows
that homosexual adolescent males rarely use or do not use their Gaydar on women
because they find it difficult to identify their sexual orientation. This
finding is contradictory to the results of the experiment regarding the
importance of feutural and configural processing where they emphasized that
sexual orientation is easily distinguished in women (Tambak & Zayas, 2012).
The finding is also contradictory to the experiment of Ambady et al regarding
female sexual orientation perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from
the face and its features where it says that it is easier to judge female
sexual orientation than male sexual orientation (Rule, Ambady & Hallett,
2009). Although this might not be generalizable in this study considering the
participants of our interview were only homosexual males unlike the non-gender
specific - male and female participants, of the two said research. Also, based
on these results, we recommend that future researchers also study Gaydar among
homosexual adolescent females so that results regarding the said previous
experiments may be validated in the real life setting.
REFERENCES:
Rule, N. O.,
Ambady, N., & Hallett, K. C. (2009). Female sexual orientation is perceived
accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features.Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology, (45), 1245-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.010
Tabak J, Zayas V
(2012) The roles of ceatural and configural face processing in snap judgments
of sexual orientation. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36671. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036671
What is your basis for choosing adolescents, particularly the age group 16 to 20, as a criterion for the participants of your study? Adolescence is the period wherein one goes through numerous changes. Do you think you would have achieved stronger results, had you chosen to interview a different age group, perhaps older? those already done with adolescence?
ReplyDeleteVery interesting study, by the way. :)
-Undergraduate Psychology student
Hi Marian! We chose adolescents because we believe that they are more exploratory than in older stages of development. They are more likely to try new things and are more openminded than those who are in the older stages of development. Thus, we believe that adolescents people are more appropriate in our research because they can tell us different experiences on how they use their Gaydar.
DeleteThank you for the comment and the compliment!:)
Was this topic assigned? If not, Why did you choose this topic? How hard was it to gather date for your research and how did you make the participants at ease while conducting the interview?
ReplyDelete-Undergraduate Non-Psych Student
Hi, Janry! This topic was not assigned to us, but we chose this topic because we have noticed that not alot of researches have been devoted to Gaydar. Looking into Gaydar, the how's and the why's, contribute to our better understanding of them which then leads to better relationships with homosexuals. It is also a way for us to address misconceptions about them and somehow help other people understand them better also. We had some difficulties in searching for participants who are willing to be interviewed because of the schedule, however, during the interview we made them feel at ease through "pakapa-kapa" and "pakikipagkwentuhan".
DeleteThank you for your comment!:)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe overall data is good. There is just one area which I think should be improved on: The theme "Experience with other gays" should've been elaborated. If I got it right, the main question in this part is: How one's gaydar is developed? Now I think it would have been more informative if the theme "Experience with other gays" was elaborated. Specifically, it would've been better if you have provided specific "stages" that gays undergo WHILE INTERACTING WITH OTHER GAYS that enhance their gaydar...Fine, one stage that makes my gaydar better is when I interact with other gays...BUT what specifically are those "key experiences" or "stages" (if there are any) within that gay interaction that enhances may gaydar? Your study lacks that detail...But the overall themese of the study is very good in a sense that it is very comprehensive...Each theme was clearly supported by your subjects specific responses...Keep it up!
ReplyDeleteSir Howard (sorry for the late reply...)
Thank you for your question Sir Howard :) as to address it, our participants did not mention any stages as to how their Gaydar develops with interaction with gays. The key experiences they mentioned however were socializing and interacting with them. Through the “pakikisama” with the homosexuals they get to know more about them and through talking to them they get to understand them better. They first look at how they talk, their hand gestures and lastly how the other relates to them. Our participants mentioned that they develop their Gaydar by interacting with gays because they get to find out if the other exhibits similar characteristics to them. There is no fixed step as to how they interact but most of them use the "pakikisama".
Delete